HTML vs TypeScript

The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams meets javascript with a safety net. Here's our take.

HTML

Nice Pick

The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.

Pros

• Universal browser support means it just works everywhere
• Simple syntax that's easy to learn for beginners
• Essential foundation for all web development
• Semantic elements improve accessibility and SEO

Cons

• Can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting
• Limited interactivity on its own—needs JavaScript for anything fun

TypeScript

JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.

Pros

• Static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging
• Excellent IDE support with autocompletion and refactoring tools
• Gradual adoption allows mixing with plain JavaScript
• Strong community and regular updates from Microsoft

Cons

• Adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow
• Type definitions can become verbose and complex in large projects

The Verdict

Use HTML if: You want universal browser support means it just works everywhere and can live with can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting.

Use TypeScript if: You prioritize static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging over what HTML offers.

The Bottom Line

HTML wins

The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.