HTML vs Varnish Configuration Language
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams meets the dsl that makes caching feel like writing a novel, but at least your website loads faster. Here's our take.
HTML
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
HTML
Nice PickThe web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
Pros
- +Universal browser support means it just works everywhere
- +Simple syntax that's easy to learn for beginners
- +Essential foundation for all web development
- +Semantic elements improve accessibility and SEO
Cons
- -Can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting
- -Limited interactivity on its own—needs JavaScript for anything fun
Varnish Configuration Language
The DSL that makes caching feel like writing a novel, but at least your website loads faster.
Pros
- +Fine-grained control over HTTP caching and request routing
- +Declarative syntax simplifies complex caching logic
- +Compiles to C for high-performance execution
- +Extensive built-in functions for header manipulation
Cons
- -Steep learning curve with its own quirky syntax
- -Debugging can be a nightmare without proper logging setup
The Verdict
Use HTML if: You want universal browser support means it just works everywhere and can live with can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting.
Use Varnish Configuration Language if: You prioritize fine-grained control over http caching and request routing over what HTML offers.
The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev