HTTP/3 vs HTTP/2

Developers should learn and use HTTP/3 to enhance web application performance, especially for latency-sensitive use cases like video streaming, online gaming, and real-time communication meets developers should learn and use http/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic. Here's our take.

HTTP/3

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use HTTP/3 to enhance web application performance, especially for latency-sensitive use cases like video streaming, online gaming, and real-time communication

Pros

• It is increasingly supported by major browsers, servers, and CDNs, making it essential for optimizing user experience in high-traffic environments and improving security with mandatory TLS encryption
• Related to: quic, tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

HTTP/2

Developers should learn and use HTTP/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic

Pros

• It is essential for performance-critical use cases like e-commerce platforms, streaming services, and real-time applications where reduced latency and efficient resource loading are crucial
• Related to: http-1-1, tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. HTTP/3 is a protocol while HTTP/2 is a concept. We picked HTTP/3 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

HTTP/3 wins

Based on overall popularity. HTTP/3 is more widely used, but HTTP/2 excels in its own space.