Identity and Access Management vs Zero Trust Security

Developers should learn IAM to build secure applications that protect sensitive data and comply with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA meets developers should learn zero trust security when building modern applications, especially in cloud-native, hybrid, or remote work environments, to enhance protection against data breaches and insider threats. Here's our take.

Identity and Access Management

Nice Pick

Developers should learn IAM to build secure applications that protect sensitive data and comply with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA

Pros

• It's essential for implementing authentication (e
• Related to: authentication, authorization

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Zero Trust Security

Developers should learn Zero Trust Security when building modern applications, especially in cloud-native, hybrid, or remote work environments, to enhance protection against data breaches and insider threats

Pros

• It's crucial for implementing secure access controls, microservices architectures, and compliance with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA, as it reduces attack surfaces and improves resilience against sophisticated cyberattacks
• Related to: identity-and-access-management, network-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Identity and Access Management if: You want it's essential for implementing authentication (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Zero Trust Security if: You prioritize it's crucial for implementing secure access controls, microservices architectures, and compliance with regulations like gdpr or hipaa, as it reduces attack surfaces and improves resilience against sophisticated cyberattacks over what Identity and Access Management offers.

The Bottom Line

Identity and Access Management wins

Developers should learn IAM to build secure applications that protect sensitive data and comply with regulations like GDPR or HIPAA