Dynamic

Idris vs Agda

Developers should learn Idris when building systems where correctness is critical, such as in safety-critical applications, financial systems, or cryptographic protocols, as dependent types help eliminate entire classes of bugs at compile time meets developers should learn agda when working on projects that require high assurance of correctness, such as in safety-critical systems, cryptography, or formal methods research. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Idris

Developers should learn Idris when building systems where correctness is critical, such as in safety-critical applications, financial systems, or cryptographic protocols, as dependent types help eliminate entire classes of bugs at compile time

Idris

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Idris when building systems where correctness is critical, such as in safety-critical applications, financial systems, or cryptographic protocols, as dependent types help eliminate entire classes of bugs at compile time

Pros

  • +It is also valuable for academic research in programming language theory and for developers interested in advanced type systems to improve code reliability
  • +Related to: dependent-types, haskell

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Agda

Developers should learn Agda when working on projects that require high assurance of correctness, such as in safety-critical systems, cryptography, or formal methods research

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for verifying algorithms, proving properties of programs, and exploring advanced type systems, making it valuable in fields like programming language theory and formal verification
  • +Related to: dependent-types, haskell

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Idris if: You want it is also valuable for academic research in programming language theory and for developers interested in advanced type systems to improve code reliability and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Agda if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for verifying algorithms, proving properties of programs, and exploring advanced type systems, making it valuable in fields like programming language theory and formal verification over what Idris offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Idris wins

Developers should learn Idris when building systems where correctness is critical, such as in safety-critical applications, financial systems, or cryptographic protocols, as dependent types help eliminate entire classes of bugs at compile time

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev