Incremental Rewrite vs Big Bang Rewrite
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations meets developers might consider a big bang rewrite when a legacy system is so outdated, poorly documented, or tightly coupled that incremental changes are impractical or too costly. Here's our take.
Incremental Rewrite
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Incremental Rewrite
Nice PickDevelopers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for minimizing downtime, enabling iterative testing and feedback, and allowing teams to deliver value continuously while modernizing the codebase
- +Related to: refactoring, legacy-system-migration
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Big Bang Rewrite
Developers might consider a Big Bang Rewrite when a legacy system is so outdated, poorly documented, or tightly coupled that incremental changes are impractical or too costly
Pros
- +It's suitable for small to medium-sized systems where the team can afford a complete halt and rebuild, often to adopt modern technologies, fix architectural flaws, or meet new business requirements quickly
- +Related to: legacy-system-migration, refactoring
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Incremental Rewrite if: You want it is particularly valuable for minimizing downtime, enabling iterative testing and feedback, and allowing teams to deliver value continuously while modernizing the codebase and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Big Bang Rewrite if: You prioritize it's suitable for small to medium-sized systems where the team can afford a complete halt and rebuild, often to adopt modern technologies, fix architectural flaws, or meet new business requirements quickly over what Incremental Rewrite offers.
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev