Incremental Rewrite vs Greenfield Development
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations meets developers should use greenfield development when starting new projects, such as building a startup product, creating a new service in a microservices architecture, or developing a prototype for innovation. Here's our take.
Incremental Rewrite
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Incremental Rewrite
Nice PickDevelopers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for minimizing downtime, enabling iterative testing and feedback, and allowing teams to deliver value continuously while modernizing the codebase
- +Related to: refactoring, legacy-system-migration
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Greenfield Development
Developers should use greenfield development when starting new projects, such as building a startup product, creating a new service in a microservices architecture, or developing a prototype for innovation
Pros
- +It allows for modern best practices, avoids technical debt from legacy systems, and enables teams to select the most suitable tools and frameworks from the outset
- +Related to: software-architecture, agile-methodology
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Incremental Rewrite if: You want it is particularly valuable for minimizing downtime, enabling iterative testing and feedback, and allowing teams to deliver value continuously while modernizing the codebase and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Greenfield Development if: You prioritize it allows for modern best practices, avoids technical debt from legacy systems, and enables teams to select the most suitable tools and frameworks from the outset over what Incremental Rewrite offers.
Developers should use Incremental Rewrite when dealing with large, critical legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced all at once due to business constraints, high risk, or resource limitations
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev