Infrastructure as Code Scanning vs Manual Infrastructure Review

Developers should use IaC scanning to shift security left in the DevOps pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix meets developers should learn and use manual infrastructure review when conducting security audits, ensuring regulatory compliance (e. Here's our take.

Infrastructure as Code Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should use IaC scanning to shift security left in the DevOps pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix

Pros

• It is critical for compliance-driven industries (e
• Related to: terraform, cloudformation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Infrastructure Review

Developers should learn and use Manual Infrastructure Review when conducting security audits, ensuring regulatory compliance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: security-auditing, compliance-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Infrastructure as Code Scanning is a tool while Manual Infrastructure Review is a methodology. We picked Infrastructure as Code Scanning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Infrastructure as Code Scanning wins

Based on overall popularity. Infrastructure as Code Scanning is more widely used, but Manual Infrastructure Review excels in its own space.