Infrastructure as Code Scanning vs Post Deployment Auditing

Developers should use IaC scanning to shift security left in the DevOps pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix meets developers should learn and use post deployment auditing to mitigate risks and ensure high-quality releases in production systems, particularly in devops or continuous delivery pipelines where rapid deployments are common. Here's our take.

Infrastructure as Code Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should use IaC scanning to shift security left in the DevOps pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix

Pros

• It is critical for compliance-driven industries (e
• Related to: terraform, cloudformation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Post Deployment Auditing

Developers should learn and use Post Deployment Auditing to mitigate risks and ensure high-quality releases in production systems, particularly in DevOps or continuous delivery pipelines where rapid deployments are common

Pros

• It is crucial for applications handling sensitive data, such as in finance or healthcare, to comply with regulatory standards like GDPR or HIPAA, and for large-scale systems where downtime or security breaches can have significant consequences
• Related to: devops, security-auditing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Infrastructure as Code Scanning is a tool while Post Deployment Auditing is a methodology. We picked Infrastructure as Code Scanning based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Infrastructure as Code Scanning wins

Based on overall popularity. Infrastructure as Code Scanning is more widely used, but Post Deployment Auditing excels in its own space.