Dynamic

Insecure Coding vs Security By Design

Developers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e meets developers should adopt security by design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Insecure Coding

Developers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e

Insecure Coding

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: secure-coding, owasp-top-10

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Security By Design

Developers should adopt Security By Design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Insecure Coding is a concept while Security By Design is a methodology. We picked Insecure Coding based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Insecure Coding wins

Based on overall popularity. Insecure Coding is more widely used, but Security By Design excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev