Insecure Coding vs Security By Design
Developers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e meets developers should adopt security by design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e. Here's our take.
Insecure Coding
Developers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e
Insecure Coding
Nice PickDevelopers should learn about insecure coding to understand common vulnerabilities (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: secure-coding, owasp-top-10
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Security By Design
Developers should adopt Security By Design when building applications that handle sensitive data (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: threat-modeling, secure-coding
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Insecure Coding is a concept while Security By Design is a methodology. We picked Insecure Coding based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Insecure Coding is more widely used, but Security By Design excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev