Instant Messaging Etiquette vs In-Person Communication

Developers should learn Instant Messaging Etiquette to collaborate effectively in remote or hybrid teams, where instant messaging is a primary communication tool meets developers should master in-person communication to enhance collaboration in agile teams, conduct effective client meetings, and present technical concepts clearly to non-technical stakeholders. Here's our take.

Instant Messaging Etiquette

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Instant Messaging Etiquette to collaborate effectively in remote or hybrid teams, where instant messaging is a primary communication tool

Pros

• It is crucial for reducing interruptions, managing notifications, and conveying technical information clearly, especially in agile workflows or when coordinating on projects like code reviews or incident responses
• Related to: remote-collaboration, agile-methodologies

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

In-Person Communication

Developers should master in-person communication to enhance collaboration in agile teams, conduct effective client meetings, and present technical concepts clearly to non-technical stakeholders

Pros

• It is essential for pair programming, code reviews, sprint planning, and resolving conflicts, as it fosters trust, reduces misunderstandings, and improves project outcomes
• Related to: active-listening, presentation-skills

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Instant Messaging Etiquette is a methodology while In-Person Communication is a concept. We picked Instant Messaging Etiquette based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Instant Messaging Etiquette wins

Based on overall popularity. Instant Messaging Etiquette is more widely used, but In-Person Communication excels in its own space.