Dynamic

Interactive Application Security Testing vs Static Application Security Testing

Developers should use IAST during the development and testing phases of the software development lifecycle, particularly in CI/CD pipelines, to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities early meets developers should use sast to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities during the development phase, reducing the cost and risk of late-stage remediation. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Interactive Application Security Testing

Developers should use IAST during the development and testing phases of the software development lifecycle, particularly in CI/CD pipelines, to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities early

Interactive Application Security Testing

Nice Pick

Developers should use IAST during the development and testing phases of the software development lifecycle, particularly in CI/CD pipelines, to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities early

Pros

  • +It is especially valuable for web applications, APIs, and microservices where real-time analysis can catch issues that static tools might miss, such as runtime configuration problems or business logic flaws
  • +Related to: static-application-security-testing, dynamic-application-security-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Application Security Testing

Developers should use SAST to proactively identify and fix security vulnerabilities during the development phase, reducing the cost and risk of late-stage remediation

Pros

  • +It is essential for compliance with security standards (e
  • +Related to: dynamic-application-security-testing, software-security

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Interactive Application Security Testing if: You want it is especially valuable for web applications, apis, and microservices where real-time analysis can catch issues that static tools might miss, such as runtime configuration problems or business logic flaws and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Static Application Security Testing if: You prioritize it is essential for compliance with security standards (e over what Interactive Application Security Testing offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Interactive Application Security Testing wins

Developers should use IAST during the development and testing phases of the software development lifecycle, particularly in CI/CD pipelines, to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities early

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev