Internal Tool Development vs Low Code Platforms

Developers should learn and engage in Internal Tool Development when working in organizations that require bespoke solutions to optimize operations, reduce manual effort, or handle proprietary data securely meets developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise. Here's our take.

Internal Tool Development

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and engage in Internal Tool Development when working in organizations that require bespoke solutions to optimize operations, reduce manual effort, or handle proprietary data securely

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in scenarios where off-the-shelf software is insufficient, such as automating repetitive tasks, building integrations between internal systems, or creating tools for data visualization and reporting
• Related to: software-development, automation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Low Code Platforms

Developers should learn low code platforms to accelerate prototyping, automate repetitive tasks, and enable collaboration with business stakeholders who lack coding expertise

Pros

• They are particularly useful for building internal tools, business process applications, and MVPs (Minimum Viable Products) where speed and agility are prioritized over custom code
• Related to: business-process-automation, drag-and-drop-interfaces

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Internal Tool Development is a methodology while Low Code Platforms is a platform. We picked Internal Tool Development based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Internal Tool Development wins

Based on overall popularity. Internal Tool Development is more widely used, but Low Code Platforms excels in its own space.