Jakarta EE vs Quarkus

Developers should learn Jakarta EE when building large-scale, distributed enterprise applications that require robustness, security, and integration with legacy systems, such as in banking, e-commerce, or government sectors meets developers should learn quarkus when building cloud-native applications, microservices, or serverless functions in java, as it significantly improves performance and resource efficiency compared to traditional java frameworks. Here's our take.

Jakarta EE

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Jakarta EE when building large-scale, distributed enterprise applications that require robustness, security, and integration with legacy systems, such as in banking, e-commerce, or government sectors

Pros

• It is particularly useful for projects needing standardized APIs for persistence, messaging, and web services, and for teams transitioning to cloud-native development with support for containers and microservices
• Related to: java, microservices

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Quarkus

Developers should learn Quarkus when building cloud-native applications, microservices, or serverless functions in Java, as it significantly improves performance and resource efficiency compared to traditional Java frameworks

Pros

• It is particularly useful in Kubernetes or Docker environments where fast startup and low memory footprint are critical, and for projects requiring modern features like reactive programming or integration with tools like Kafka or RESTEasy
• Related to: java, kubernetes

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Jakarta EE is a platform while Quarkus is a framework. We picked Jakarta EE based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Jakarta EE wins

Based on overall popularity. Jakarta EE is more widely used, but Quarkus excels in its own space.