JavaScript Template Literals vs Template Engines

Developers should use template literals when building dynamic strings, such as generating HTML, SQL queries, or log messages, as they simplify code and improve maintainability compared to traditional string concatenation meets developers should use template engines when building web applications to dynamically render content, such as user-specific data or product listings, without cluttering code with html strings. Here's our take.

JavaScript Template Literals

Nice Pick

Developers should use template literals when building dynamic strings, such as generating HTML, SQL queries, or log messages, as they simplify code and improve maintainability compared to traditional string concatenation

Pros

• They are essential for modern JavaScript development, especially in frameworks like React or Node
• Related to: javascript, es6

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Template Engines

Developers should use template engines when building web applications to dynamically render content, such as user-specific data or product listings, without cluttering code with HTML strings

Pros

• They are essential for server-side rendering in frameworks like Django or Express
• Related to: jinja2, handlebars

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. JavaScript Template Literals is a language while Template Engines is a tool. We picked JavaScript Template Literals based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

JavaScript Template Literals wins

Based on overall popularity. JavaScript Template Literals is more widely used, but Template Engines excels in its own space.