Dynamic

JavaScript vs TypeScript

The language that runs the web, whether you like it or not meets javascript with a safety net. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

JavaScript

The language that runs the web, whether you like it or not. It's everywhere, and it's not going anywhere.

JavaScript

Nice Pick

The language that runs the web, whether you like it or not. It's everywhere, and it's not going anywhere.

Pros

  • +Runs natively in browsers, making it essential for front-end web development
  • +Huge ecosystem with npm and frameworks like React and Node.js
  • +Flexible and forgiving syntax for quick prototyping

Cons

  • -Type coercion and quirks can lead to subtle bugs
  • -Performance can be inconsistent across different engines

TypeScript

JavaScript with a safety net. Because runtime errors are for amateurs.

Pros

  • +Static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging
  • +Excellent IDE support with autocompletion and refactoring tools
  • +Gradual adoption allows mixing with plain JavaScript
  • +Strong community and regular updates from Microsoft

Cons

  • -Adds compilation step, slowing down development workflow
  • -Type definitions can become verbose and complex in large projects

The Verdict

Use JavaScript if: You want runs natively in browsers, making it essential for front-end web development and can live with type coercion and quirks can lead to subtle bugs.

Use TypeScript if: You prioritize static typing catches bugs early, saving hours of debugging over what JavaScript offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
JavaScript wins

The language that runs the web, whether you like it or not. It's everywhere, and it's not going anywhere.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev