Dynamic

Jekyll vs Next.js

Developers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing meets developers should learn next. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Jekyll

Developers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing

Jekyll

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing

Pros

  • +It is ideal for blogs, project documentation, and personal websites where content is mostly static and can be version-controlled with Git
  • +Related to: ruby, markdown

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Next.js

Developers should learn Next

Pros

  • +js when building production-ready React applications that require improved performance, SEO, or server-side capabilities, such as e-commerce sites, blogs, or dashboards
  • +Related to: react, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Jekyll is a tool while Next.js is a framework. We picked Jekyll based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Jekyll wins

Based on overall popularity. Jekyll is more widely used, but Next.js excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev