Jekyll vs Next.js
Developers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing meets developers should learn next. Here's our take.
Jekyll
Developers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing
Jekyll
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Jekyll when they need to build fast, secure, and low-maintenance static websites without the overhead of a database or server-side processing
Pros
- +It is ideal for blogs, project documentation, and personal websites where content is mostly static and can be version-controlled with Git
- +Related to: ruby, markdown
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Next.js
Developers should learn Next
Pros
- +js when building production-ready React applications that require improved performance, SEO, or server-side capabilities, such as e-commerce sites, blogs, or dashboards
- +Related to: react, javascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Jekyll is a tool while Next.js is a framework. We picked Jekyll based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Jekyll is more widely used, but Next.js excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev