Jetty vs Undertow

Developers should learn Jetty when building Java-based web applications that require a fast, embeddable server, such as in microservices architectures, development environments (e meets developers should use undertow when building high-throughput, low-latency web applications in java, especially for microservices or embedded scenarios where minimal resource usage is critical. Here's our take.

Jetty

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Jetty when building Java-based web applications that require a fast, embeddable server, such as in microservices architectures, development environments (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: java, servlet-api

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Undertow

Developers should use Undertow when building high-throughput, low-latency web applications in Java, especially for microservices or embedded scenarios where minimal resource usage is critical

Pros

• It is ideal for real-time applications using WebSockets or for serving static content quickly, as its event-driven model outperforms traditional blocking servers like Tomcat in concurrent request handling
• Related to: java, wildfly

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Jetty if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Undertow if: You prioritize it is ideal for real-time applications using websockets or for serving static content quickly, as its event-driven model outperforms traditional blocking servers like tomcat in concurrent request handling over what Jetty offers.

The Bottom Line

Jetty wins

Developers should learn Jetty when building Java-based web applications that require a fast, embeddable server, such as in microservices architectures, development environments (e