JavaServer Faces vs Thymeleaf

Developers should learn JSF when building enterprise-level web applications in Java, especially in environments that use Jakarta EE or require integration with other Java technologies like EJBs and JPA meets developers should learn thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with java, especially in spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating. Here's our take.

JavaServer Faces

Nice Pick

Developers should learn JSF when building enterprise-level web applications in Java, especially in environments that use Jakarta EE or require integration with other Java technologies like EJBs and JPA

Pros

• It is useful for projects needing rapid development with pre-built UI components, such as admin panels or data-driven applications, and when working in legacy systems or corporate settings where Java EE is standard
• Related to: jakarta-ee, java

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Thymeleaf

Developers should learn Thymeleaf when building server-side rendered web applications with Java, especially in Spring-based projects, as it provides a clean separation of concerns and supports natural templating

Pros

• It is ideal for use cases like generating dynamic HTML content, email templates, or reports where server-side processing is required, and it avoids the need for complex JavaScript frameworks for simple dynamic pages
• Related to: spring-framework, java

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. JavaServer Faces is a framework while Thymeleaf is a library. We picked JavaServer Faces based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

JavaServer Faces wins

Based on overall popularity. JavaServer Faces is more widely used, but Thymeleaf excels in its own space.