html2pdf vs jsPDF

Developers should use html2pdf when they need to generate PDFs from web-based content in applications such as e-commerce platforms for invoices, educational sites for certificates, or business tools for reports meets developers should use jspdf when they need to generate pdfs dynamically on the client-side, such as for creating invoices, reports, or downloadable content in web apps, as it reduces server load and improves user experience. Here's our take.

html2pdf

Nice Pick

Developers should use html2pdf when they need to generate PDFs from web-based content in applications such as e-commerce platforms for invoices, educational sites for certificates, or business tools for reports

Pros

• It's particularly valuable for automating document creation without manual design, ensuring consistency and saving time in workflows that require printable or archivable outputs from HTML data
• Related to: html, css

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

jsPDF

Developers should use jsPDF when they need to generate PDFs dynamically on the client-side, such as for creating invoices, reports, or downloadable content in web apps, as it reduces server load and improves user experience

Pros

• It's particularly useful in scenarios where real-time PDF creation is required, like in dashboards or data visualization tools, and when integrating with front-end frameworks like React or Vue
• Related to: javascript, html5

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. html2pdf is a tool while jsPDF is a library. We picked html2pdf based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

html2pdf wins

Based on overall popularity. html2pdf is more widely used, but jsPDF excels in its own space.