Dynamic

Julia vs DAX

The language that promises Python's ease with C's speed, and actually delivers meets excel formulas on steroids, but good luck remembering the syntax for time intelligence. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Julia

The language that promises Python's ease with C's speed, and actually delivers... most of the time.

Julia

Nice Pick

The language that promises Python's ease with C's speed, and actually delivers... most of the time.

Pros

  • +Just-in-time (JIT) compiler delivers near-C performance for numerical tasks
  • +Multiple dispatch makes code expressive and flexible for scientific computing
  • +Built-in parallelism and distributed computing support out of the box
  • +Syntax is clean and familiar to users from Python or MATLAB

Cons

  • -Startup time can be slow due to JIT compilation, annoying for quick scripts
  • -Smaller ecosystem compared to Python, so you might still need to drop into other languages for some libraries

DAX

Excel formulas on steroids, but good luck remembering the syntax for time intelligence.

Pros

  • +Seamless integration with Microsoft Power BI and Excel for powerful data modeling
  • +Built-in time intelligence functions make date-based calculations a breeze
  • +Optimized for performance on large tabular datasets

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve with cryptic error messages that leave you guessing
  • -Limited to Microsoft ecosystem, so no cross-platform flexibility

The Verdict

Use Julia if: You want just-in-time (jit) compiler delivers near-c performance for numerical tasks and can live with startup time can be slow due to jit compilation, annoying for quick scripts.

Use DAX if: You prioritize seamless integration with microsoft power bi and excel for powerful data modeling over what Julia offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Julia wins

The language that promises Python's ease with C's speed, and actually delivers... most of the time.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev