Kubernetes Persistent Volumes vs Docker Volumes

Developers should learn and use Kubernetes Persistent Volumes when deploying stateful applications like databases (e meets developers should use docker volumes when they need to persist data across container restarts or deployments, such as for database storage in production environments or caching layers in development. Here's our take.

Kubernetes Persistent Volumes

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Kubernetes Persistent Volumes when deploying stateful applications like databases (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: kubernetes, persistentvolumeclaims

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Docker Volumes

Developers should use Docker Volumes when they need to persist data across container restarts or deployments, such as for database storage in production environments or caching layers in development

Pros

• They are essential for stateful applications where data integrity is critical, and they offer advantages like easier backup, migration, and management compared to other storage options like bind mounts or tmpfs mounts
• Related to: docker, docker-compose

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Kubernetes Persistent Volumes is a concept while Docker Volumes is a tool. We picked Kubernetes Persistent Volumes based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Kubernetes Persistent Volumes wins

Based on overall popularity. Kubernetes Persistent Volumes is more widely used, but Docker Volumes excels in its own space.