AWS Lambda vs Linode
Serverless computing that makes you feel like a wizard—until you get hit with cold starts and vendor lock-in meets the cloud provider that doesn't make you feel like you're navigating a corporate maze just to spin up a server. Here's our take.
AWS Lambda
Serverless computing that makes you feel like a wizard—until you get hit with cold starts and vendor lock-in.
AWS Lambda
Nice PickServerless computing that makes you feel like a wizard—until you get hit with cold starts and vendor lock-in.
Pros
- +No server management—just upload code and it runs automatically
- +Auto-scales from zero to thousands of concurrent executions
- +Pay-per-use pricing model (you only pay for compute time)
- +Integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like S3 and API Gateway
Cons
- -Cold starts can cause unpredictable latency spikes
- -Vendor lock-in with AWS ecosystem makes migration painful
- -Limited execution time and memory constraints (up to 15 minutes)
Linode
The cloud provider that doesn't make you feel like you're navigating a corporate maze just to spin up a server.
Pros
- +Transparent, predictable pricing with no hidden fees
- +Simple, intuitive web interface that actually makes sense
- +Excellent documentation and responsive support
- +High-performance SSD-based VPS with global data centers
Cons
- -Fewer advanced enterprise features compared to AWS or Azure
- -Managed services can be limited for complex workloads
The Verdict
Use AWS Lambda if: You want no server management—just upload code and it runs automatically and can live with cold starts can cause unpredictable latency spikes.
Use Linode if: You prioritize transparent, predictable pricing with no hidden fees over what AWS Lambda offers.
Serverless computing that makes you feel like a wizard—until you get hit with cold starts and vendor lock-in.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev