LINQ to SQL vs Dapper

Developers should learn LINQ to SQL when building meets developers should use dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw sql control is preferred. Here's our take.

LINQ to SQL

Nice Pick

Developers should learn LINQ to SQL when building

Pros

• NET applications that require efficient data access to SQL Server databases, as it simplifies database operations by eliminating much of the boilerplate SQL code
• Related to: csharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dapper

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring simple CRUD operations, complex queries, or when integrating with existing SQL-heavy codebases, as it reduces boilerplate while maintaining SQL transparency
• Related to: c-sharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. LINQ to SQL is a framework while Dapper is a library. We picked LINQ to SQL based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

LINQ to SQL wins

Based on overall popularity. LINQ to SQL is more widely used, but Dapper excels in its own space.