Local Storage vs IndexedDB

Developers should use Local Storage for storing non-sensitive client-side data that needs to persist between sessions, such as user preferences, theme settings, or form data drafts meets developers should learn indexeddb when building progressive web apps (pwas) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players. Here's our take.

Local Storage

Nice Pick

Developers should use Local Storage for storing non-sensitive client-side data that needs to persist between sessions, such as user preferences, theme settings, or form data drafts

Pros

• It's ideal for offline web applications, caching static assets, and improving performance by reducing server requests for frequently accessed data
• Related to: session-storage, cookies

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

IndexedDB

Developers should learn IndexedDB when building progressive web apps (PWAs) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players

Pros

• It's essential for scenarios where users need to access and manipulate data without an internet connection, and for caching large datasets like product catalogs or user-generated content to reduce server load and latency
• Related to: javascript, progressive-web-apps

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Local Storage is a concept while IndexedDB is a database. We picked Local Storage based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Local Storage wins

Based on overall popularity. Local Storage is more widely used, but IndexedDB excels in its own space.