Dynamic

Looker vs Heap

The BI platform that makes data modeling feel like a full-time job, but at least the dashboards look pretty meets automatic analytics that captures everything, so you can stop guessing what users actually do. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Looker

The BI platform that makes data modeling feel like a full-time job, but at least the dashboards look pretty.

Looker

Nice Pick

The BI platform that makes data modeling feel like a full-time job, but at least the dashboards look pretty.

Pros

  • +Powerful LookML modeling language for reusable, version-controlled data definitions
  • +Seamless integration with modern data warehouses like BigQuery and Snowflake
  • +Self-service analytics that empowers non-technical users to build custom reports

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve for LookML, requiring dedicated data engineers or analysts
  • -Pricing can be prohibitive for small teams, with enterprise-focused costs

Heap

Automatic analytics that captures everything, so you can stop guessing what users actually do.

Pros

  • +Auto-captures all user events without manual instrumentation
  • +Retroactive analysis lets you query past data without pre-defining events
  • +Intuitive visual interface for non-technical team members
  • +Session replay and heatmaps integrated with analytics

Cons

  • -Can become expensive quickly as data volume grows
  • -Data sampling on free and lower-tier plans limits accuracy
  • -Requires careful data governance to avoid noise from irrelevant events

The Verdict

Use Looker if: You want powerful lookml modeling language for reusable, version-controlled data definitions and can live with steep learning curve for lookml, requiring dedicated data engineers or analysts.

Use Heap if: You prioritize auto-captures all user events without manual instrumentation over what Looker offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Looker wins

The BI platform that makes data modeling feel like a full-time job, but at least the dashboards look pretty.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev