Low Availability Design vs High Availability
Developers should consider Low Availability Design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs meets developers should learn and implement high availability for critical applications where downtime can lead to significant financial losses, reputational damage, or safety risks, such as in e-commerce platforms, banking systems, healthcare services, and telecommunications. Here's our take.
Low Availability Design
Developers should consider Low Availability Design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs
Low Availability Design
Nice PickDevelopers should consider Low Availability Design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs
Pros
- +It is particularly useful in cost-sensitive projects, rapid development cycles, or when dealing with legacy systems where achieving high availability would be prohibitively expensive
- +Related to: high-availability, fault-tolerance
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
High Availability
Developers should learn and implement High Availability for critical applications where downtime can lead to significant financial losses, reputational damage, or safety risks, such as in e-commerce platforms, banking systems, healthcare services, and telecommunications
Pros
- +It is essential in cloud-native and distributed systems to handle failures gracefully, ensuring resilience and reliability, and is often required in service-level agreements (SLAs) to meet customer expectations for uninterrupted access
- +Related to: load-balancing, failover-clustering
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Low Availability Design if: You want it is particularly useful in cost-sensitive projects, rapid development cycles, or when dealing with legacy systems where achieving high availability would be prohibitively expensive and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use High Availability if: You prioritize it is essential in cloud-native and distributed systems to handle failures gracefully, ensuring resilience and reliability, and is often required in service-level agreements (slas) to meet customer expectations for uninterrupted access over what Low Availability Design offers.
Developers should consider Low Availability Design when building systems where high availability is not a priority, such as internal dashboards, batch processing jobs, or prototypes, to reduce complexity and infrastructure costs
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev