LPWAN vs Wi-Fi

Developers should learn LPWAN when building IoT solutions that require long battery life, wide coverage, and low-cost connectivity, such as in smart agriculture, environmental monitoring, or industrial automation meets developers should learn wi-fi for building applications that rely on wireless connectivity, such as iot devices, mobile apps, and network-dependent software. Here's our take.

LPWAN

Nice Pick

Developers should learn LPWAN when building IoT solutions that require long battery life, wide coverage, and low-cost connectivity, such as in smart agriculture, environmental monitoring, or industrial automation

Pros

• It is particularly useful for applications where devices are deployed in remote or hard-to-reach locations and need to send infrequent, small data packets, as it minimizes power consumption and infrastructure costs compared to traditional cellular or Wi-Fi networks
• Related to: iot, lorawan

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Wi-Fi

Developers should learn Wi-Fi for building applications that rely on wireless connectivity, such as IoT devices, mobile apps, and network-dependent software

Pros

• It's essential for implementing features like real-time data synchronization, remote control, and location-based services, and is critical in environments where wired connections are impractical or for enhancing user mobility
• Related to: networking, iot-development

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. LPWAN is a concept while Wi-Fi is a technology. We picked LPWAN based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

LPWAN wins

Based on overall popularity. LPWAN is more widely used, but Wi-Fi excels in its own space.