Make vs CMake
Developers should learn Make when working on projects with multiple source files, especially in C/C++ development, where manual compilation is error-prone and time-consuming meets developers should learn cmake when working on c, c++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e. Here's our take.
Make
Developers should learn Make when working on projects with multiple source files, especially in C/C++ development, where manual compilation is error-prone and time-consuming
Make
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Make when working on projects with multiple source files, especially in C/C++ development, where manual compilation is error-prone and time-consuming
Pros
- +It is essential for automating repetitive build processes, ensuring consistency across environments, and integrating with continuous integration pipelines
- +Related to: c-programming, c-plus-plus
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
CMake
Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: c-plus-plus, make
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Make if: You want it is essential for automating repetitive build processes, ensuring consistency across environments, and integrating with continuous integration pipelines and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use CMake if: You prioritize g over what Make offers.
Developers should learn Make when working on projects with multiple source files, especially in C/C++ development, where manual compilation is error-prone and time-consuming
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev