Make vs CMake
Developers should learn Make when working on projects that require complex build processes, such as compiling source code, linking libraries, or managing dependencies across multiple files meets developers should learn cmake when working on c, c++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e. Here's our take.
Make
Developers should learn Make when working on projects that require complex build processes, such as compiling source code, linking libraries, or managing dependencies across multiple files
Make
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Make when working on projects that require complex build processes, such as compiling source code, linking libraries, or managing dependencies across multiple files
Pros
- +It is essential for C/C++ development, embedded systems, and any scenario where incremental builds improve efficiency, as it avoids unnecessary recompilation by tracking file changes
- +Related to: c, c-plus-plus
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
CMake
Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: c-plus-plus, make
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Make if: You want it is essential for c/c++ development, embedded systems, and any scenario where incremental builds improve efficiency, as it avoids unnecessary recompilation by tracking file changes and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use CMake if: You prioritize g over what Make offers.
Developers should learn Make when working on projects that require complex build processes, such as compiling source code, linking libraries, or managing dependencies across multiple files
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev