Manual Accessibility Auditing vs Accessibility Testing

Developers should learn manual accessibility auditing to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, especially in regulated industries like government or healthcare where accessibility is mandated meets developers should learn and use accessibility testing to build products that are legally compliant (e. Here's our take.

Manual Accessibility Auditing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn manual accessibility auditing to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, especially in regulated industries like government or healthcare where accessibility is mandated

Pros

• It is crucial when building user interfaces that require precise interaction, such as forms, dynamic content, or multimedia, as automated tools often fail to detect usability issues for screen readers or keyboard-only users
• Related to: web-accessibility, wcag-compliance

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Accessibility Testing

Developers should learn and use accessibility testing to build products that are legally compliant (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: web-accessibility, assistive-technologies

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Manual Accessibility Auditing if: You want it is crucial when building user interfaces that require precise interaction, such as forms, dynamic content, or multimedia, as automated tools often fail to detect usability issues for screen readers or keyboard-only users and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Accessibility Testing if: You prioritize g over what Manual Accessibility Auditing offers.

The Bottom Line

Manual Accessibility Auditing wins

Developers should learn manual accessibility auditing to ensure their products are inclusive and legally compliant, especially in regulated industries like government or healthcare where accessibility is mandated