Dynamic

Manual DevOps vs Infrastructure as Code

Developers should learn about Manual DevOps to understand the foundational processes and challenges that automation aims to solve, especially when working in legacy systems or small-scale projects where automation might be overkill meets developers should learn infrastructure as code to achieve faster, more reliable, and scalable infrastructure deployments, especially in cloud-native and microservices environments. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Manual DevOps

Nice Pick

Pros

+It is useful in scenarios like initial setup phases, debugging complex issues that require hands-on intervention, or in environments with strict compliance requirements where manual oversight is necessary
+Related to: devops, automation

Cons

-Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Infrastructure as Code

Developers should learn Infrastructure as Code to achieve faster, more reliable, and scalable infrastructure deployments, especially in cloud-native and microservices environments

Pros

+It is crucial for automating repetitive tasks, ensuring consistency across development, staging, and production environments, and enabling infrastructure to be treated as a disposable resource
+Related to: terraform, ansible

Cons

-Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Manual DevOps if: You want it is useful in scenarios like initial setup phases, debugging complex issues that require hands-on intervention, or in environments with strict compliance requirements where manual oversight is necessary and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Infrastructure as Code if: You prioritize it is crucial for automating repetitive tasks, ensuring consistency across development, staging, and production environments, and enabling infrastructure to be treated as a disposable resource over what Manual DevOps offers.

🧊

The Bottom Line

Manual DevOps wins

Learn about Manual DevOps →Learn about Infrastructure as Code →

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev