Manual Formatting vs ESLint

Developers should use manual formatting when working in environments where automated formatting tools are unavailable, restricted, or when fine-grained control over code presentation is necessary, such as in legacy systems or specific project requirements meets developers should use eslint to ensure code consistency across teams, catch syntax errors and potential bugs during development, and enforce coding standards like airbnb or google style guides. Here's our take.

Manual Formatting

Nice Pick

Developers should use manual formatting when working in environments where automated formatting tools are unavailable, restricted, or when fine-grained control over code presentation is necessary, such as in legacy systems or specific project requirements

Pros

• It is also useful for learning coding standards and developing good habits, as it forces awareness of style conventions
• Related to: code-style-guides, code-readability

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

ESLint

Developers should use ESLint to ensure code consistency across teams, catch syntax errors and potential bugs during development, and enforce coding standards like Airbnb or Google style guides

Pros

• It is essential in collaborative projects to reduce code review time and improve maintainability, especially in large JavaScript/TypeScript applications where manual linting is impractical
• Related to: javascript, typescript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Manual Formatting is a methodology while ESLint is a tool. We picked Manual Formatting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Manual Formatting wins

Based on overall popularity. Manual Formatting is more widely used, but ESLint excels in its own space.