Manual Script Tagging vs Dynamic Imports

Developers should use Manual Script Tagging when building simple static websites, maintaining legacy codebases, or when fine-grained control over script loading is required, such as for performance optimization or debugging meets developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading. Here's our take.

Manual Script Tagging

Nice Pick

Developers should use Manual Script Tagging when building simple static websites, maintaining legacy codebases, or when fine-grained control over script loading is required, such as for performance optimization or debugging

Pros

• It's essential for understanding core web fundamentals before moving to modern tools, and useful in scenarios where minimal tooling is preferred, like quick prototypes or educational projects
• Related to: html, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dynamic Imports

Developers should use dynamic imports to optimize web applications by splitting code into smaller chunks that load only when needed, such as for route-based or feature-based lazy loading

Pros

• This is crucial for large-scale applications to reduce initial load times, improve user experience, and manage bandwidth efficiently, especially in environments with limited resources like mobile devices
• Related to: javascript, webpack

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Manual Script Tagging is a methodology while Dynamic Imports is a concept. We picked Manual Script Tagging based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Manual Script Tagging wins

Based on overall popularity. Manual Script Tagging is more widely used, but Dynamic Imports excels in its own space.