Dynamic

Manual Security Analysis vs Dynamic Application Security Testing

Developers should learn and use Manual Security Analysis when building or maintaining high-risk applications, such as financial systems, healthcare software, or critical infrastructure, where security is paramount meets developers should use dast during the testing phase of the software development lifecycle to identify runtime security vulnerabilities that static analysis might miss, such as injection flaws, broken authentication, and sensitive data exposure. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Manual Security Analysis

Developers should learn and use Manual Security Analysis when building or maintaining high-risk applications, such as financial systems, healthcare software, or critical infrastructure, where security is paramount

Manual Security Analysis

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Manual Security Analysis when building or maintaining high-risk applications, such as financial systems, healthcare software, or critical infrastructure, where security is paramount

Pros

  • +It is essential during security audits, compliance checks (e
  • +Related to: penetration-testing, code-review

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Dynamic Application Security Testing

Developers should use DAST during the testing phase of the software development lifecycle to identify runtime security vulnerabilities that static analysis might miss, such as injection flaws, broken authentication, and sensitive data exposure

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable for web applications and APIs exposed to the internet, as it helps ensure compliance with security standards like OWASP Top 10 and PCI-DSS before deployment
  • +Related to: static-application-security-testing, penetration-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Manual Security Analysis if: You want it is essential during security audits, compliance checks (e and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Dynamic Application Security Testing if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable for web applications and apis exposed to the internet, as it helps ensure compliance with security standards like owasp top 10 and pci-dss before deployment over what Manual Security Analysis offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Manual Security Analysis wins

Developers should learn and use Manual Security Analysis when building or maintaining high-risk applications, such as financial systems, healthcare software, or critical infrastructure, where security is paramount

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev