Manual Threat Hunting vs Vulnerability Scanning

Developers should learn Manual Threat Hunting to enhance their security skills, especially when building or maintaining critical applications, as it helps in identifying vulnerabilities, understanding attack vectors, and improving incident response meets developers should learn and use vulnerability scanning to integrate security into the software development lifecycle (sdlc), particularly in devsecops practices, to proactively identify and fix security issues before deployment. Here's our take.

Manual Threat Hunting

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Manual Threat Hunting to enhance their security skills, especially when building or maintaining critical applications, as it helps in identifying vulnerabilities, understanding attack vectors, and improving incident response

Pros

• It is particularly useful in environments with high-security requirements, such as finance, healthcare, or government sectors, where automated tools might miss sophisticated attacks like zero-day exploits or insider threats
• Related to: incident-response, security-information-and-event-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Vulnerability Scanning

Developers should learn and use vulnerability scanning to integrate security into the software development lifecycle (SDLC), particularly in DevSecOps practices, to proactively identify and fix security issues before deployment

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with security standards (e
• Related to: penetration-testing, static-application-security-testing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Manual Threat Hunting is a methodology while Vulnerability Scanning is a tool. We picked Manual Threat Hunting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Manual Threat Hunting wins

Based on overall popularity. Manual Threat Hunting is more widely used, but Vulnerability Scanning excels in its own space.