Manual Version Control vs Git

Developers should learn manual version control as a foundational skill to understand the core concepts of versioning, such as tracking changes, reverting to previous states, and managing collaboration, which are essential even when using automated systems meets git is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.

Manual Version Control

Nice Pick

Developers should learn manual version control as a foundational skill to understand the core concepts of versioning, such as tracking changes, reverting to previous states, and managing collaboration, which are essential even when using automated systems

Pros

• It is particularly useful in scenarios where automated tools are not feasible, such as in environments with strict security constraints, for quick prototyping, or when teaching version control basics to beginners
• Related to: git, version-control-systems

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Git

Git is widely used in the industry and worth learning

Pros

• Widely used in the industry
• Related to: github, gitlab

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Manual Version Control is a methodology while Git is a tool. We picked Manual Version Control based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Manual Version Control wins

Based on overall popularity. Manual Version Control is more widely used, but Git excels in its own space.