Dynamic

Markdown vs HTML

The lazy developer's best friend meets the web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams. Here's our take.

đź§ŠNice Pick

Markdown

The lazy developer's best friend. Write docs without touching HTML, but good luck with complex layouts.

Markdown

Nice Pick

The lazy developer's best friend. Write docs without touching HTML, but good luck with complex layouts.

Pros

  • +Dead simple syntax that anyone can learn in minutes
  • +Widely supported across platforms like GitHub and static site generators
  • +Plain text format makes it version-control friendly

Cons

  • -Limited formatting options—good luck with tables or advanced styling
  • -Inconsistent implementations across tools can cause headaches

HTML

The web's skeleton—without it, everything's just a blob of text and broken dreams.

Pros

  • +Universal browser support means it just works everywhere
  • +Simple syntax that's easy to learn for beginners
  • +Essential foundation for all web development
  • +Semantic elements improve accessibility and SEO

Cons

  • -Can get messy and unreadable without proper formatting
  • -Limited interactivity on its own—needs JavaScript for anything fun

The Verdict

Use Markdown if: You want dead simple syntax that anyone can learn in minutes and can live with limited formatting options—good luck with tables or advanced styling.

Use HTML if: You prioritize universal browser support means it just works everywhere over what Markdown offers.

đź§Š
The Bottom Line
Markdown wins

The lazy developer's best friend. Write docs without touching HTML, but good luck with complex layouts.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev