Dynamic

Material-UI vs Next.js

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not meets react's opinionated best friend. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Material-UI

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Material-UI

Nice Pick

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Pros

  • +Massive component library with built-in accessibility
  • +Easy theming and customization via CSS-in-JS
  • +Strong community support and frequent updates

Cons

  • -Can lead to bloated bundle sizes if not tree-shaken properly
  • -Default Material Design aesthetic might feel generic

Next.js

React's opinionated best friend. All the server-side rendering, none of the excuses.

Pros

  • +Built-in server-side rendering and static site generation
  • +File-based routing that's actually intuitive
  • +Automatic code splitting for better performance
  • +Seamless API routes for backend logic

Cons

  • -Can feel bloated for simple projects
  • -Learning curve with its opinionated structure

The Verdict

Use Material-UI if: You want massive component library with built-in accessibility and can live with can lead to bloated bundle sizes if not tree-shaken properly.

Use Next.js if: You prioritize built-in server-side rendering and static site generation over what Material-UI offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Material-UI wins

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev