Dynamic

Material-UI vs Relay

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not meets graphql's overbearing but brilliant bodyguard. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Material-UI

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Material-UI

Nice Pick

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Pros

  • +Massive component library with built-in accessibility
  • +Easy theming and customization via CSS-in-JS
  • +Strong community support and frequent updates

Cons

  • -Can lead to bloated bundle sizes if not tree-shaken properly
  • -Default Material Design aesthetic might feel generic

Relay

GraphQL's overbearing but brilliant bodyguard. It'll fetch your data perfectly, but good luck arguing with it.

Pros

  • +Automatic caching and pagination out of the box
  • +Declarative data fetching reduces boilerplate code
  • +Optimized network requests for better performance

Cons

  • -Steep learning curve with complex setup and conventions
  • -Tight coupling to GraphQL can limit flexibility

The Verdict

Use Material-UI if: You want massive component library with built-in accessibility and can live with can lead to bloated bundle sizes if not tree-shaken properly.

Use Relay if: You prioritize automatic caching and pagination out of the box over what Material-UI offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Material-UI wins

The React component library that makes your app look like Google's, whether you want it to or not.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev