Dynamic

Memcached vs Redis

The OG in-memory cache that's still kicking ass, because sometimes simple and fast is all you need meets the in-memory swiss army knife that's fast enough to make your other databases blush. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Memcached

The OG in-memory cache that's still kicking ass, because sometimes simple and fast is all you need.

Memcached

Nice Pick

The OG in-memory cache that's still kicking ass, because sometimes simple and fast is all you need.

Pros

  • +Blazing fast for simple key-value lookups
  • +Dead-simple to set up and scale horizontally
  • +Minimal memory overhead per item
  • +Widely supported across programming languages

Cons

  • -No persistence—data vanishes on restart
  • -Limited to basic operations, no complex queries or data structures

Redis

The in-memory Swiss Army knife that's fast enough to make your other databases blush.

Pros

  • +Blazing fast in-memory data storage
  • +Versatile data structures like lists, sets, and hashes
  • +Built-in persistence options for durability
  • +Pub/sub messaging for real-time applications

Cons

  • -Memory can be expensive at scale
  • -Limited querying compared to relational databases

The Verdict

Use Memcached if: You want blazing fast for simple key-value lookups and can live with no persistence—data vanishes on restart.

Use Redis if: You prioritize blazing fast in-memory data storage over what Memcached offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Memcached wins

The OG in-memory cache that's still kicking ass, because sometimes simple and fast is all you need.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev