Memory Safe Languages vs C
Developers should learn and use memory safe languages when building systems where security, reliability, and stability are critical, such as in web servers, operating systems, embedded devices, or financial applications, to minimize exploits and crashes meets c is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.
Memory Safe Languages
Developers should learn and use memory safe languages when building systems where security, reliability, and stability are critical, such as in web servers, operating systems, embedded devices, or financial applications, to minimize exploits and crashes
Memory Safe Languages
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use memory safe languages when building systems where security, reliability, and stability are critical, such as in web servers, operating systems, embedded devices, or financial applications, to minimize exploits and crashes
Pros
- +They are particularly valuable in environments prone to cyberattacks or where manual memory management in languages like C or C++ introduces high risk of bugs
- +Related to: rust, java
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
C
C is widely used in the industry and worth learning
Pros
- +Widely used in the industry
- +Related to: various technologies
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Memory Safe Languages is a concept while C is a language. We picked Memory Safe Languages based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Memory Safe Languages is more widely used, but C excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev