Dynamic

Message Authentication Codes vs HMAC

Developers should learn and use MACs when building secure systems that require data integrity and authentication, such as in network protocols (e meets developers should learn hmac when building secure applications that require message authentication, such as in api authentication (e. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Message Authentication Codes

Developers should learn and use MACs when building secure systems that require data integrity and authentication, such as in network protocols (e

Message Authentication Codes

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use MACs when building secure systems that require data integrity and authentication, such as in network protocols (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: cryptography, hash-functions

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

HMAC

Developers should learn HMAC when building secure applications that require message authentication, such as in API authentication (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: cryptography, api-authentication

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Message Authentication Codes if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use HMAC if: You prioritize g over what Message Authentication Codes offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Message Authentication Codes wins

Developers should learn and use MACs when building secure systems that require data integrity and authentication, such as in network protocols (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev