Message Queuing Telemetry Transport vs HTTP/2

Developers should learn MQTT when building IoT systems, such as smart home devices, industrial automation, or telemetry applications, where reliable, low-overhead messaging is critical meets developers should learn and use http/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic. Here's our take.

Message Queuing Telemetry Transport

Nice Pick

Developers should learn MQTT when building IoT systems, such as smart home devices, industrial automation, or telemetry applications, where reliable, low-overhead messaging is critical

Pros

• It is particularly useful for environments with limited connectivity or battery-powered devices, as it supports quality of service levels and persistent sessions to ensure message delivery
• Related to: iot-communication, publish-subscribe-pattern

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

HTTP/2

Developers should learn and use HTTP/2 when building modern web applications to enhance speed and user experience, especially for sites with many resources or high traffic

Pros

• It is essential for performance-critical use cases like e-commerce platforms, streaming services, and real-time applications where reduced latency and efficient resource loading are crucial
• Related to: http-1-1, tls

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Message Queuing Telemetry Transport is a platform while HTTP/2 is a concept. We picked Message Queuing Telemetry Transport based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Message Queuing Telemetry Transport wins

Based on overall popularity. Message Queuing Telemetry Transport is more widely used, but HTTP/2 excels in its own space.