Microsoft Graph Calendar vs CalDAV

Developers should learn Microsoft Graph Calendar when building applications that need to interact with Microsoft 365 calendars, such as scheduling tools, meeting management apps, or workflow automation systems meets developers should learn caldav when building calendar applications, integrating calendar functionality into software, or implementing synchronization features for events and tasks across platforms. Here's our take.

Microsoft Graph Calendar

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Microsoft Graph Calendar when building applications that need to interact with Microsoft 365 calendars, such as scheduling tools, meeting management apps, or workflow automation systems

Pros

• It is essential for scenarios like syncing events across platforms, automating meeting creation based on triggers, or embedding calendar views in custom dashboards, leveraging Microsoft's ecosystem for enterprise productivity
• Related to: microsoft-graph, rest-api

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CalDAV

Developers should learn CalDAV when building calendar applications, integrating calendar functionality into software, or implementing synchronization features for events and tasks across platforms

Pros

• It is essential for creating interoperable calendar solutions that work with servers like Apple Calendar Server, Google Calendar (via CalDAV API), and other CalDAV-compliant services, ensuring data consistency and real-time updates
• Related to: webdav, icalendar

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Microsoft Graph Calendar is a platform while CalDAV is a protocol. We picked Microsoft Graph Calendar based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Microsoft Graph Calendar wins

Based on overall popularity. Microsoft Graph Calendar is more widely used, but CalDAV excels in its own space.