Microsoft SQL Server vs MySQL

The enterprise database that loves Windows more than your IT department loves stability meets the reliable old workhorse of databases—it's not flashy, but it gets the job done without drama. Here's our take.

Microsoft SQL Server

Nice Pick

The enterprise database that loves Windows more than your IT department loves stability.

Pros

• Seamless integration with the Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., Azure, .NET, Power BI)
• Robust enterprise features like Always On availability groups and in-memory OLTP
• Excellent performance for transaction-heavy workloads with strong ACID compliance

Cons

• Licensing costs can be eye-watering for small teams or startups
• Historically Windows-centric, though Linux support is improving but still second-class

MySQL

The reliable old workhorse of databases—it's not flashy, but it gets the job done without drama.

Pros

• Widely supported with extensive documentation and community
• Excellent performance for read-heavy workloads
• Easy to set up and manage with tools like phpMyAdmin

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features found in PostgreSQL
• Can struggle with complex queries and high concurrency

The Verdict

Use Microsoft SQL Server if: You want seamless integration with the microsoft ecosystem (e.g., azure, .net, power bi) and can live with licensing costs can be eye-watering for small teams or startups.

Use MySQL if: You prioritize widely supported with extensive documentation and community over what Microsoft SQL Server offers.

The Bottom Line

Microsoft SQL Server wins

The enterprise database that loves Windows more than your IT department loves stability.