MIDI vs Custom Protocols

Developers should learn MIDI when working on music software, digital audio workstations (DAWs), synthesizers, or interactive audio applications, as it provides a standardized way to handle musical data and device communication meets developers should learn and use custom protocols when standard protocols are insufficient for specific use cases, such as low-latency requirements in real-time applications (e. Here's our take.

MIDI

Nice Pick

Developers should learn MIDI when working on music software, digital audio workstations (DAWs), synthesizers, or interactive audio applications, as it provides a standardized way to handle musical data and device communication

Pros

• It is essential for creating plugins, virtual instruments, or hardware integrations in the music technology industry, enabling precise control over musical events and parameters programmatically
• Related to: audio-programming, digital-signal-processing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Custom Protocols

Developers should learn and use custom protocols when standard protocols are insufficient for specific use cases, such as low-latency requirements in real-time applications (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: network-programming, socket-programming

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. MIDI is a protocol while Custom Protocols is a concept. We picked MIDI based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

MIDI wins

Based on overall popularity. MIDI is more widely used, but Custom Protocols excels in its own space.