Dynamic

MongoDB vs DynamoDB

The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema meets aws's nosql powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

MongoDB

The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.

MongoDB

Nice Pick

The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.

Pros

  • +Flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration
  • +Native JSON-like document storage fits well with modern web apps
  • +Horizontal scaling with sharding is straightforward
  • +Aggregation pipeline is powerful for complex queries

Cons

  • -Lack of enforced schema can lead to messy data over time
  • -Joins are clunky compared to relational databases

DynamoDB

AWS's NoSQL powerhouse that scales like a dream but makes you think in keys and indexes.

Pros

  • +Serverless architecture with automatic scaling
  • +Single-digit millisecond latency for most operations
  • +Built-in backup and point-in-time recovery
  • +Seamless integration with other AWS services

Cons

  • -Pricing can be unpredictable with high throughput
  • -Limited query flexibility compared to relational databases

The Verdict

Use MongoDB if: You want flexible schema allows rapid prototyping and iteration and can live with lack of enforced schema can lead to messy data over time.

Use DynamoDB if: You prioritize serverless architecture with automatic scaling over what MongoDB offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
MongoDB wins

The database for when you want to store JSON and pretend it's a schema.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev