MonoDevelop vs Rider
Developers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform meets developers should use rider when working on . Here's our take.
MonoDevelop
Developers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform
MonoDevelop
Nice PickDevelopers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform
Pros
- +NET applications, especially in Linux or macOS environments where Visual Studio might not be available
- +Related to: c-sharp, dotnet-framework
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Rider
Developers should use Rider when working on
Pros
- +NET projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on Windows, macOS, and Linux
- +Related to: c-sharp, unity
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use MonoDevelop if: You want net applications, especially in linux or macos environments where visual studio might not be available and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Rider if: You prioritize net projects, especially in cross-platform environments, as it provides a unified experience on windows, macos, and linux over what MonoDevelop offers.
Developers should learn MonoDevelop when working on cross-platform
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev