Dynamic

Move vs Rust

Developers should learn Move when working on blockchain projects that require robust smart contract security, especially on Aptos or Sui networks, as it is their native language meets rust is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Move

Developers should learn Move when working on blockchain projects that require robust smart contract security, especially on Aptos or Sui networks, as it is their native language

Move

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Move when working on blockchain projects that require robust smart contract security, especially on Aptos or Sui networks, as it is their native language

Pros

  • +It is ideal for building decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other blockchain-based systems where asset safety and correctness are critical
  • +Related to: aptos, sui

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Rust

Rust is widely used in the industry and worth learning

Pros

  • +Widely used in the industry
  • +Related to: webassembly

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Move if: You want it is ideal for building decentralized finance (defi) applications, non-fungible tokens (nfts), and other blockchain-based systems where asset safety and correctness are critical and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Rust if: You prioritize widely used in the industry over what Move offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Move wins

Developers should learn Move when working on blockchain projects that require robust smart contract security, especially on Aptos or Sui networks, as it is their native language

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev